A shortage of spare components and support could immobilize F-35 fighters, compromising their combat efficiency.

Efficiency and Profitability versus Combat Efficiency The fixation on efficiency and profitability has caused allied air forces to depend on a “just in time” supply chain, which is not always effective in contested situations.

Military leaders across generations have attempted to incorporate business practices into the military domain, often with suboptimal outcomes.

Just-in-time logistics exemplifies the transfer of practices from the commercial sphere to the military.

Predictability is vital for “just in time” logistics These logistics are effective in stable and predictable settings, like in an airline, but not in ωar circumstances. Military rivalry and ωar eliminate the predictability required for just-in-time logistics to function smoothly. Unpredictability can result in supply chain disruptions and leave F-35 fighters without essential support.

The “just in time” mindset in military culture Lt. Gen. Michael Schmidt highlights that the “just in time” mentality is embedded in military institutions’ culture, making it challenging to adapt to conflict scenarios.

Resistance to altering this mindset could negatively impact the F-35’s combat efficiency. A cultural transformation within the military-industrial complex might be required to guarantee that F-35s are prepared for battle.

The significance of surplus in military logistics Historically, military commanders understood the need for surplus supplies to ensure success on the battlefield.

This insight must be reacquired and integrated into the institutional DNA of the US military. Amassing fighting forces and transporting supplies to required locations are vital.

Moving away from “just in time” logistics To guarantee the F-35 fighters’ effectiveness in ωar, it is crucial to relinquish “just in time” logistics and adjust the supply chain to accommodate military environment demands.