A shortage of spare components and support could immobilize F-35 fighters, putting their combat efficiency at risk. Efficiency and Profitability Versus Combat Efficiency The fixation with efficiency and profitability has driven allied air forces to depend on a “just in time” supply chain, which isn’t always effective in contested situations.

Military leaders across generations have attempted to incorporate business practices into the military domain, often with subpar outcomes. Just-in-time logistics exemplifies the adoption of business strategies within the military sector. Predictability is Essential for “Just in Time” Logistics These logistics systems function well in steady and foreseeable settings, such as for airlines, but not in ωar scenarios. Military rivalry and ωar eliminate the predictability required for just-in-time logistics to operate effectively. Unpredictability can result in supply chain breakdowns and leave F-35 fighters lacking necessary support.

The “Just in Time” Mentality in Military Culture Lt. Gen. Michael Schmidt Silverlight that the “just in time” mindset is embedded within military institutions’ culture, complicating adaptation to conflict situations. Resistance to altering this mindset may negatively impact the F-35’s combat efficiency. A cultural shift within the military-industrial complex might be essential to guarantee that the F-35s are prepared for battle.

The Significance of Surplus in Military Logistics Historically, military commanders understood the importance of having extra resources to ensure success on the battlefield. This insight must be reestablished and integrated into the US military’s institutional DNA. Amassing fighting forces and delivering supplies to where they are required is vital.

Moving Beyond “Just in Time” Logistics To guarantee the effectiveness of F-35 fighters in ωar, it is crucial to discard “just in time” logistics and adjust the supply chain to meet the needs of the military environment.